Is the 5p carrier bag charge detrimental to retailers and for no good purpose?

Is the 5p charge worth it?

It’s been four months since the introduction of the 5 pence charge for a carrier bag, which has become somewhat tolerable after media frenzy on the issue. The law was introduced by the government on October 5, in order to reduce the use of carrier bags and help protect the environment.

The controversial law applies only to businesses with 250 employees or more and is at the discretion of those businesses below the employee threshold.

The law is following suit to that which was introduced in Wales on 1 October 2011 and the government hope it will soon become custom in England. However, some consumers have not taken to the introduction so kindly expressing the charge as yet another tax and some claiming it is a ‘profitable tax ploy’.

Other than attempting to protect the environment, is there any other benefit to the consumer for paying is ‘bag tax’?  Well, many of us have been in a situation where our bags have split whilst carrying our shopping home:  the new introductions provide a form of protection since the new 5 pence charge now creates a sale of goods contract.

Previously a carrier bag was free and therefore if your bag split, shops were under no obligation to replace or compensate you for it. Now that there is a contract between you and the retailer, there is a legal obligation that the bags be fit for purpose. If the bags durability is not suitable, retailers could be compelled to compensate for the goods as consequential damages.

Does the purpose defeat the objective? The likelihood is retailers will strengthen their carrier bags which in turn could be more harmful to the environment. So is the 5p charge worth it?
Jermaine Malcolm


Business Services News

Read Next


What people say

"We shall, no doubt, be engaging you again soon"

"The matter was concluded very successfully and I’d like to thank John and Wilson again for their helpful and highly professional work earlier this year."

Alex Bailey, Trichromic LLP'

"Great Source of Support"

"You have essentially achieved what we had set out to do. Thank you for all of your assistance in this matter. Throughout this ordeal, you have been a great source of support."

Mary Anne Poutanen, Canada

"I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

"You provided the key essentials (and more) for client satisfaction. I am extremely pleased with the services provided by your company and the legal team provided for me. To also turnaround my situation making it a positive outcome, I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

Marvyn Smith, London

"I would recomend this service to anyone who has a legal matter"

"I'm so glad I had this advice before my CMD. I was very much prepared and think my company (whom I'm taking to a tribunal) were shocked at my knowledge. I would recommend this service to anyone who has a legal matter."

Jacqueline Stevenson, Bristol

"Can’t wait for another session!"

"John Spyrou kindly offered to provide our publishing firm with an update on libel and defamation law. Those who attended - a mix of veteran editors and those new to the world of journalism - all said how practical and useful they found the training – and now can’t wait for another session!"

Paul Snell, Redactive Media Group

"Highly recommended"

"Alana & Pinder Reaux’s level of service has been exceptionally high. Always keen to help out with the work in an efficient manner. Highly recommended."

Trading Point of Financial Instruments UK Ltd

"Fast and Reliable"

"Fast and reliable notary service for notarisation/legalisation of College reports for foreign office and embassies."

Student Services Department, CATS College London

"One step ahead of the opposition"

"'John Spyrou has the ability to pre-empty arguments and see issues before they arise, thereby allowing him to be one step ahead of the opposition’"

Christopher Bovey, Angelbird Technologies GmbH