Spot Fixing Trial Collapses

The collapse of the spot fixing prosecution against 13 footballers by the CPS following a ‘further review of evidence’ is indicative of the manner in which credibility of evidence, in particular witness evidence, is considered by the Court. 

The CPS has said today that it considered substantial evidence, including the evidence of Mazher Mahmood (aka the Fake Sheikh) in reaching its conclusion not to pursue the case. It cited the recent collapse of the proceedings in the Tulisa case following the in reliability of Mr Mahmood’s evidence on the stand R v Tulisa & Coombes. 

The CPS were probably seriously concerned that Mr Mahmood’s veracity would likely be challenged on the stand and his honesty impugned following the Tulisa trial collapse. This is something the CPS would not have been able to mitigate or protect against during the course of the trial, and would have played hugely in the minds of the jury. A long dark road that no matter how good the CPS advocate would have been it is unlikely they would have been able to turn the jury’s mind away from Mr Mahmood’s apparent lack of forthrightness. This in turn would have likely lead to a not guilty verdict and embarrassment all round for the CPS. Hence the CPS decision to halt matters in their tracks now. 

The cessation of this high profile spot fixing prosecution, which apparently involved players from some of the highest echelons of English football, shows that the making of a witness statement and ones’ credibility on the stand, be it in civil or criminal proceedings can be a toxic stain that follows the maker from case to case and has a huge, potentially terminal impact, on litigation strategy. 

John Spyrou


Pinder Reaux & Associates Ltd

Business Services News

Read Next


What people say

"We shall, no doubt, be engaging you again soon"

"The matter was concluded very successfully and I’d like to thank John and Wilson again for their helpful and highly professional work earlier this year."

Alex Bailey, Trichromic LLP'

"Great Source of Support"

"You have essentially achieved what we had set out to do. Thank you for all of your assistance in this matter. Throughout this ordeal, you have been a great source of support."

Mary Anne Poutanen, Canada

"I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

"You provided the key essentials (and more) for client satisfaction. I am extremely pleased with the services provided by your company and the legal team provided for me. To also turnaround my situation making it a positive outcome, I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

Marvyn Smith, London

"I would recomend this service to anyone who has a legal matter"

"I'm so glad I had this advice before my CMD. I was very much prepared and think my company (whom I'm taking to a tribunal) were shocked at my knowledge. I would recommend this service to anyone who has a legal matter."

Jacqueline Stevenson, Bristol

"Can’t wait for another session!"

"John Spyrou kindly offered to provide our publishing firm with an update on libel and defamation law. Those who attended - a mix of veteran editors and those new to the world of journalism - all said how practical and useful they found the training – and now can’t wait for another session!"

Paul Snell, Redactive Media Group

"Highly recommended"

"Alana & Pinder Reaux’s level of service has been exceptionally high. Always keen to help out with the work in an efficient manner. Highly recommended."

Trading Point of Financial Instruments UK Ltd

"Fast and Reliable"

"Fast and reliable notary service for notarisation/legalisation of College reports for foreign office and embassies."

Student Services Department, CATS College London

"One step ahead of the opposition"

"'John Spyrou has the ability to pre-empty arguments and see issues before they arise, thereby allowing him to be one step ahead of the opposition’"

Christopher Bovey, Angelbird Technologies GmbH