The Return of the Super-Injunction?

The Return of the Super-Injunction?

A recent judgment handed down by Mrs Justice Elisabeth Laing recently in the case of A1, A2 and X has begged the question – are super-injunctions going to be making a return?

Most people know about the notoriety of super-injunctions, which largely came to public prominence in 2011 following the Imogen Thomas and Ryan Giggs matter.

Broadly put a super-injunction is an escalated type of injunction which prevents not only disclosure of the subject matter upon which the injunction is concerned but also any disclosure of the existence of the super-injunction itself.

Following the Imogen Thomas/ Ryan Giggs matter in 2011, which was quickly unravelled following a Twitter storm of attention, super-injunctions became essentially old news and from a legal perspective extremely difficult to obtain, largely for the simple reason that they were tough to police and the increase in usage of social media in to general everyday life meant that there was a more than real chance than the terms of a super-injunction would be revealed, thereby making them largely moot. However, Mrs Justice Elisabeth Laing’s recent decision could see a change to this, and return to the days of super-injunctions.

The case at hand concerned an application, by a high profile prominent sportsman (Mr Sportsman), who appeared in adverts and held positions of responsibility in sport, to obtain a High Court injunction banning him and his lover being named. The Defendant sought to argue that Mr Sportsman should not be allowed to avail himself of an injunction because he had ‘broken rules’ by meeting her in hotels for sex when he should have been readying himself for events, thereby deceiving his girlfriend and team manager – therefore his position as a prominent sportsman and role model is undermined by such behaviour. It was common ground between the parties that the relationship was some time ago and lasted only a few months.

Mrs Justice Elisabeth Laing appreciated that some material in respect of the parties had previously been published, but the further proposed substantive story would be much more detailed and would inevitably cause embarrassment to Mr Sportsman and his wife. Although Mr Sportsman did not deny any of the alleged deceits, Mrs Justice Elisabeth Laing still found that the affair was one of a private existence and that Mr Sportsman is “a role model for sportsmen and aspiring sportsmen. His position does not turn him into an example in every sphere of his existence.” In her judgement she found that a discreetly conducted affair, before Mr Sportsman’s marriage is not inconsistent with his public personae regardless of whether it involved a breach of team rules. Even though he was a prominent sportsman, she considered that this did not mean that implicitly his views on private morality should be published by means of his public personae – hence the injunction to protect identity was granted accordingly.

Although different from super-injunctions, the type of injunction handed down by Mrs Justice Elisabeth Laing shows that the Court are not shy in exercising their discretionary powers to block the naming of high profile persons with positions of responsibility. The next step of course would be that the Court precludes the disclosure of the fact that the injunction was obtained in the first instance and this would put us firmly back in super-injunction territory.

John Spyrou


Pinder Reaux Solicitors

Read more about latest news on our website

And follow us on Twitter @pinderreaux @john_spyrou

Business Services News

Read Next


What people say

"We shall, no doubt, be engaging you again soon"

"The matter was concluded very successfully and I’d like to thank John and Wilson again for their helpful and highly professional work earlier this year."

Alex Bailey, Trichromic LLP'

"Great Source of Support"

"You have essentially achieved what we had set out to do. Thank you for all of your assistance in this matter. Throughout this ordeal, you have been a great source of support."

Mary Anne Poutanen, Canada

"I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

"You provided the key essentials (and more) for client satisfaction. I am extremely pleased with the services provided by your company and the legal team provided for me. To also turnaround my situation making it a positive outcome, I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

Marvyn Smith, London

"I would recomend this service to anyone who has a legal matter"

"I'm so glad I had this advice before my CMD. I was very much prepared and think my company (whom I'm taking to a tribunal) were shocked at my knowledge. I would recommend this service to anyone who has a legal matter."

Jacqueline Stevenson, Bristol

"Can’t wait for another session!"

"John Spyrou kindly offered to provide our publishing firm with an update on libel and defamation law. Those who attended - a mix of veteran editors and those new to the world of journalism - all said how practical and useful they found the training – and now can’t wait for another session!"

Paul Snell, Redactive Media Group

"Highly recommended"

"Alana & Pinder Reaux’s level of service has been exceptionally high. Always keen to help out with the work in an efficient manner. Highly recommended."

Trading Point of Financial Instruments UK Ltd

"Fast and Reliable"

"Fast and reliable notary service for notarisation/legalisation of College reports for foreign office and embassies."

Student Services Department, CATS College London

"One step ahead of the opposition"

"'John Spyrou has the ability to pre-empty arguments and see issues before they arise, thereby allowing him to be one step ahead of the opposition’"

Christopher Bovey, Angelbird Technologies GmbH