Internet Lawyers: Removing Defamatory Content From Google

3rd January 2012

 

Interesting data was recently released by Google, concerning the removal of offending web content from products which it owns. The data is focused on government requests from Google to remove content and it is not clear if the information that Google has published, includes Court orders in civil matters, where the court in effect, acts as a government agency. In relation to the UK, between January 2011 and June 2011, Google has removed a total of 11 items concerning defamation (from web searches as well as from Blogger and Google Earth). In 9 cases it did this following a Court Order.

The two other removals were as a consequence of an application by a government agency, most likely to be the Office of Fair Trading, because police requests for removal of information tend to be almost completely ignored. So over a period of 6 months, Google has only removed a total of 11 pieces of content. This information from the above database is consistent with my experience in dealing with Google Inc. over the past few years. The number of defamatory or offending pages that Google removes is worryingly low.

So who should actually be concerned about this strategy by Google Inc.? Well, the people who should be most worried about this are the poorest and the most vulnerable members of society. Obtaining Court orders against Google Inc. could get expensive and the enforcement process is also not particularly cheap. It follows that this route, of removing web content from Google websites through Court orders, is a privilege which can mainly be afforded by corporates or by those who are well off.

The poor and the vulnerable still have to wake up each morning for the rest of their days, seeing their name defamed and their well-being abused without any real prospect of having the abusive content ever removed.

Pinder Reaux & Associate

Business Services News


Read Next

Testimonials


What people say

"We shall, no doubt, be engaging you again soon"

"The matter was concluded very successfully and I’d like to thank John and Wilson again for their helpful and highly professional work earlier this year."

Alex Bailey, Trichromic LLP'

"Great Source of Support"

"You have essentially achieved what we had set out to do. Thank you for all of your assistance in this matter. Throughout this ordeal, you have been a great source of support."

Mary Anne Poutanen, Canada

"I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

"You provided the key essentials (and more) for client satisfaction. I am extremely pleased with the services provided by your company and the legal team provided for me. To also turnaround my situation making it a positive outcome, I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

Marvyn Smith, London

"I would recomend this service to anyone who has a legal matter"

"I'm so glad I had this advice before my CMD. I was very much prepared and think my company (whom I'm taking to a tribunal) were shocked at my knowledge. I would recommend this service to anyone who has a legal matter."

Jacqueline Stevenson, Bristol

"Can’t wait for another session!"

"John Spyrou kindly offered to provide our publishing firm with an update on libel and defamation law. Those who attended - a mix of veteran editors and those new to the world of journalism - all said how practical and useful they found the training – and now can’t wait for another session!"

Paul Snell, Redactive Media Group

"Highly recommended"

"Alana & Pinder Reaux’s level of service has been exceptionally high. Always keen to help out with the work in an efficient manner. Highly recommended."

Trading Point of Financial Instruments UK Ltd

"Fast and Reliable"

"Fast and reliable notary service for notarisation/legalisation of College reports for foreign office and embassies."

Student Services Department, CATS College London

"One step ahead of the opposition"

"'John Spyrou has the ability to pre-empty arguments and see issues before they arise, thereby allowing him to be one step ahead of the opposition’"

Christopher Bovey, Angelbird Technologies GmbH