To Tweet or Not To Tweet…That is The Question – what do the guidelines issued by the DPP say?

At midnight, Kier Starmer’s long awaited guidelines on social media offences were published. Guidelines long awaited by the legal profession, the police and no doubt the millions of users of social media.

So, are we any the wiser?

Simple answer, No.

Sadly, Kier Starmer has stopped short of dealing with the real problem that exists in the vast minefield of social media. Granted, as the Director of Public Prosecution, Mr Starmer cannot introduce legislation or change the legislation that already exists: this is something that only Parliament can deal with, but in his role as Director of Public Prosecution, what we were led to believe was that he would provide some clarity on issues surrounding the extent of criminality that attached itself to online comments.

We are told in the new guidelines that prosecutors should exercise discretion and aver away from prosecution when dealing with those that tweet or post a message which may appear to be offensive, but who do so only on the one occasion. Having said this, there is no guidance on how offensive an offensive comment needs to be before even the one comment is deemed suitable for prosecution, leaving this again in the hands of police/prosecutors to ultimately make a subjective choice

There is further comment and guidance which states that there will be greater powers to prosecute and sentence individuals who post comments and have a greater number of followers than those who have a fewer number of followers. This particular finding has completely thrown us here at Pinder Reaux, if I am honest it just illustrates how out of touch Kier Starmer is with the mechanics of social media. So, where does one stand if a comment is made to a select few individuals, which is then re-tweeted to a huge number of people, but without the original tweeter realising that this had taken place or without them actually wanting this to happen (similarities with the Tom Daley Twitter case spring to mind)? And where is the cut off point? If you have 1999 followers, then you are ok, but if you have 2000, then you stand to be prosecuted? There appears to be very little direct guidance on this point.

Recent social media controversies include:

Business Services News

Read Next


What people say

"We shall, no doubt, be engaging you again soon"

"The matter was concluded very successfully and I’d like to thank John and Wilson again for their helpful and highly professional work earlier this year."

Alex Bailey, Trichromic LLP'

"Great Source of Support"

"You have essentially achieved what we had set out to do. Thank you for all of your assistance in this matter. Throughout this ordeal, you have been a great source of support."

Mary Anne Poutanen, Canada

"I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

"You provided the key essentials (and more) for client satisfaction. I am extremely pleased with the services provided by your company and the legal team provided for me. To also turnaround my situation making it a positive outcome, I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

Marvyn Smith, London

"I would recomend this service to anyone who has a legal matter"

"I'm so glad I had this advice before my CMD. I was very much prepared and think my company (whom I'm taking to a tribunal) were shocked at my knowledge. I would recommend this service to anyone who has a legal matter."

Jacqueline Stevenson, Bristol

"Can’t wait for another session!"

"John Spyrou kindly offered to provide our publishing firm with an update on libel and defamation law. Those who attended - a mix of veteran editors and those new to the world of journalism - all said how practical and useful they found the training – and now can’t wait for another session!"

Paul Snell, Redactive Media Group

"Highly recommended"

"Alana & Pinder Reaux’s level of service has been exceptionally high. Always keen to help out with the work in an efficient manner. Highly recommended."

Trading Point of Financial Instruments UK Ltd

"Fast and Reliable"

"Fast and reliable notary service for notarisation/legalisation of College reports for foreign office and embassies."

Student Services Department, CATS College London

"One step ahead of the opposition"

"'John Spyrou has the ability to pre-empty arguments and see issues before they arise, thereby allowing him to be one step ahead of the opposition’"

Christopher Bovey, Angelbird Technologies GmbH