What is fair in love and war and in big money divorces?

There has been a lot in the news recently about a so called ‘cheat’s charter’ that allows the wealthier party in a divorce case to ‘hide’ money and assets out of reach of the spouse that is claiming a stake on the business that he or she has never worked in or taken an interest in, or in the money that you have worked hard to save for and invest.

Some in the legal profession were left astounded at the decision arrived at late last year by the Court of Appeal in the case of Prest v Prest, which rejected the more liberal position that the judges in the Family Division have adopted over many years. Basically, it had become the position that when dealing with finances in divorce, a spouse was entitled to disclosure of all financial documents that related to his/her spouse: be that investments, business related: whatever. The notion of the corporate veil, which exists in all commercial matters simply did not seem to be relevant in family cases at all. However, this new decision has changed all of that.

No longer can it simply be assumed that all that a company owns, automatically belongs to you as well. If you can show that your business assets are distinguishable from you as an individual, your spouse will not be able to lay a claim to it whilst dealing with the division of financial assets in the divorce proceedings. Whilst many have said that this has now allowed the more unscrupulous business owner to hide assets in a divorce case, the unarguable reality is that the corporate veil has rightfully been pulled in to place in family cases making it harder for unscrupulous spouses to assume a right to their other half’s business interests.

Rupinder Bains

Managing Director

Pinder Reaux & Associates

Business Services News

Read Next


What people say

"We shall, no doubt, be engaging you again soon"

"The matter was concluded very successfully and I’d like to thank John and Wilson again for their helpful and highly professional work earlier this year."

Alex Bailey, Trichromic LLP'

"Great Source of Support"

"You have essentially achieved what we had set out to do. Thank you for all of your assistance in this matter. Throughout this ordeal, you have been a great source of support."

Mary Anne Poutanen, Canada

"I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

"You provided the key essentials (and more) for client satisfaction. I am extremely pleased with the services provided by your company and the legal team provided for me. To also turnaround my situation making it a positive outcome, I could not have chosen a better firm to represent me."

Marvyn Smith, London

"I would recomend this service to anyone who has a legal matter"

"I'm so glad I had this advice before my CMD. I was very much prepared and think my company (whom I'm taking to a tribunal) were shocked at my knowledge. I would recommend this service to anyone who has a legal matter."

Jacqueline Stevenson, Bristol

"Can’t wait for another session!"

"John Spyrou kindly offered to provide our publishing firm with an update on libel and defamation law. Those who attended - a mix of veteran editors and those new to the world of journalism - all said how practical and useful they found the training – and now can’t wait for another session!"

Paul Snell, Redactive Media Group

"Highly recommended"

"Alana & Pinder Reaux’s level of service has been exceptionally high. Always keen to help out with the work in an efficient manner. Highly recommended."

Trading Point of Financial Instruments UK Ltd

"Fast and Reliable"

"Fast and reliable notary service for notarisation/legalisation of College reports for foreign office and embassies."

Student Services Department, CATS College London

"One step ahead of the opposition"

"'John Spyrou has the ability to pre-empty arguments and see issues before they arise, thereby allowing him to be one step ahead of the opposition’"

Christopher Bovey, Angelbird Technologies GmbH